| ARCHIVE -
ENTERTAINMENT INTERVIEWS
|
 |
 |
|
A Brief, But Edifying Conversation with Richard Linklater
7/5/2006
Posted by Mr.Beaks
 |
|
|
|
|
|

It’s probably not wise to preface this interview by lamenting that it’s too brief and ended right as we started to fall into a conversational groove, but, then again, that kind of yearning for just a little more time is very much at the heart of Richard Linklater’s best films. In Dazed and Confused, it’s the desire for an endless summer of partying, forever staving off that looming senior year and, beyond that, adulthood. In Before Sunrise, it’s the longing to spend a few more minutes in the arms of a newfound lover and potential soul mate. In Before Sunset, it’s the panicked need to connect with said soul mate or banish them from your life forever as a means of obviating an eternity of heartache. More than any filmmaker working today, Linklater knows how to earn the viewer’s empathy; once he’s got that, we’ll unquestioningly go wherever he takes us.
If the destination was uncertain in Before Sunset, it’s downright unsettling in A Scanner Darkly, Linklater’s very faithful adaptation of Philip K. Dick’s most personal novel that wrestles with addiction, paranoia and identity both humorously and mournfully. Done in the rotoscoped animation style of 2001’s Waking Life and indulging in some of that film’s penchant for wild discourse, A Scanner Darkly doesn’t take long to establish itself as something far darker and more thematically cohesive. This does not, however, mean that Linklater’s adopted anything resembling a three-act structure; though there does seem to be a story happening to the characters, they’re either unaware or unwilling to actively participate in it, which is consistent with the “Turn on, tune in, drop out” lifestyle advocated by Timothy Leary in the 1960s that eventually claimed Philip K. Dick and many others memorialized at the end of his novel and Linklater’s film.
If you have not read A Scanner Darkly, you might want to avoid this interview until you’ve seen the movie, because we discuss the “surprise” ending right off the bat. Linklater can’t help but be an interesting interview, but I really do feel like we were warming up right as I got the sign to put a lid on it. I don’t mean this as a complaint (Richard had a flight to catch that afternoon and many other journos to chat up before then); after all, Linklater will be available later in the year when Fast Food Nation rolls out.
As for now, here’s a brief conversation with Richard Linklater, whose films I love when they’re not called Bad News Bears. (Sorry, man!)

The thing that I loved about this movie, and the reason I connected with it so fully, is that the experience of watching it so closely mirrored the feeling of reading the novel.
Oh, good!
One thing I thought was interesting, though, and this might be tenuous, is that you’ve said this film plays like a nightmare.
Well, it is your worst paranoid nightmare for yourself, to imagine everyone around you is sort of using you, and you’re being set up. It’s like the further reaches of personal paranoia, but he’s right, and he goes down this road. It just gets darker, and at the end you’re just sort of… (laughs). You’re not even fundamentally alive, but you’re being used.
Well, building off that nightmare idea, I thought the film was an interesting counterpoint to Waking Life. In Waking Life, Wiley [Wiggins] floats away from us at the end presumably returning to reality, while here we float away from Keanu, leaving him in the cornfield—
(Laughing) – a burnt-out husk! I haven’t really thought about that too much, but that’s pretty good. (Laughs)
It does help unite the films in my mind.
That’s good. I’ll use that as bookending metaphors.
(Laughing) When did you first read A Scanner Darkly?
I came to it a little later. I was in my mid-twenties. My girlfriend gave me VALIS. I had seen Blade Runner, I knew the name, and I had a few books around, but I never read them. Finally, I read VALIS, and that’s an interesting one to start with. It’s kind of layered and kind of crazy, so I just kind of went back and started picking off others. I still haven’t read everything over the years. I’m not the Gnostic, deity Philip K. Dick worshipping type of fan, but I am a big fan. I’ve always loved his characters and his writing. And post-Waking Life. Philip K. Dick was kind of on my mind, so I went back and revisited a few. I thought about Ubik a little bit, but Scanner was different to me now. It was more poignant for having lived to be older. That memoriam at the end, my own list had gotten longer, you know? Everyone who was on this film had their own list of people that just… went away. It’s sad. I responded to what I always felt was a very personal novel to him. And I felt it was the kind of thing I could do. I shared the view of that book – the humor and the tragedy. It felt like the one I was chosen for. I wouldn’t be the right director for a lot of Philip K. Dick books.
Did it take much convincing with the Dick daughters?
Yeah. They needed to meet with me. I flew up to the Bay Area and hung out with them, and they said, “Just so you know, our dad would still be writing if it wasn’t for drugs”. And he would. It’s a tragedy. And they wanted to make sure that the drug element… that I had the right, respectful tone. But they liked the script. I think they liked that I kept the memoriam at the end. And Isa Hackett, his youngest daughter, looking at that list, said, “Just so you know, that’s my dad.” Everyone knows Philip K. Dick put himself on the list. And then, pointing to another name, she said, “That’s my mom. I was the little girl in that house. We moved out, and those guys moved in.” And I’m like, “Wow!” I always knew it had to be that; I knew this was real to them, and I was going to try to do it justice. And I sat next to Isa in the screening; I looked over and (pointing to his cheek) she had a little tear.
This was a film that kept coming up as potentially going into production with a variety of directors. And there was a script by Charlie Kaufman.
Yeah. I’m hearing now more people who were attached that I didn’t even know about. I didn’t know that Terry Gilliam wanted to do it at one point.

I just wonder, if Hollywood had had their way with it, how they would’ve turned it into an action film like the others.
I have no idea, but I see now how it could happen. I was spared that because our budget was so low. Due to the technique and our approach to the movie, our budget started at six [million] and ended around eight because the post-production went on forever. But I see how it could happen if I had done it live action as a twenty or thirty million dollar film. It kind of started going down that road in theory a couple of years before the cast came aboard. It starts with just a few conversations. “Well, if you do it live action…”, and then I could just see how it would go. “You know that really funny bike scene? I mean, it’s funny, but it doesn’t really advance the story, so let’s lose that.” The humor would all drop away, and there would be more elements like, “Hey, the narc! Could he be under a little more of a threat?” You see how it would happen, and how you would fall into more typical genre elements. I see how it would happen, and, probably by definition, have to happen to justify a bigger budget. That’s why I don’t begrudge these films. If you’re going to make a fifty to 100 million dollar film, it can’t be this druggie film with a bummer ending. I feel fortunate to have gotten away from that, but, again, it’s just due to the cast that came onboard and the low budget that I was able to tell the whole story. And that’s the only way I would have done it. If it would’ve started going the other way, I would’ve have been gone.
The thing that always came up when they were trying to do it live-action, and what I imagine made it so cost prohibitive, was the scramble suit. How do you do that? How do you envision it?
You kind of have something in your head, but it’s a bit of a blur. I get the question all of the time: “Couldn’t you have done this live-action?” And I go, “Yeah, but the scramble suit would probably be cheesy.” No matter how cool it was, it would probably pull you out of the film to some degree. But the graphic novel style kind of encompasses; you believe it all. In graphic novels, you can have guys’ heads blown off, and all that crazy shit feels all of the same piece. Even the performances that are a little more tweaked out – Woody [Harrelson], Rory [Cochrane] and Robert Downey, Jr. Live-action, that would’ve probably seemed over the top, but here I was okay with it. I felt it would fit in the work.

And it kind of frees you from those rigid narrative constraints. In your work, you’ve always done very well being a little unmoored from that solid three-act structure.
Yeah. This one… I don’t know what the structure is. But, yeah, I like all of those digressions that seem like digressions, but they’re not. They are the story, in a way. The challenge was the comedic and the tragic, for those to coexist. Again, I think those go together better in a literary or a graphic novel situation than in most movies. Most movies, if you really think about it, you’re sort of rigidly confined. Movies are like short stories that are tightly constructed; they have one tone that can maybe vary a little bit with some twists and turns, but you stay tonally on message. [A Scanner Darkly] has a lot of different tones.
I was reading your comments in the booklet for the new Criterion Collection release of Dazed and Confused, and you say, “Maybe I’m not a dramatic guy”. But, lately, I don’t know about that. Before Sunset had some emotionally shattering moments.
Absolutely. Wait until you see Fast Food Nation. (Mock reflectively) I must be going through a phase. (Laughs) I’m not afraid to put some of that out there, I guess, or tell stories that have that. I’m more attracted to that now.
Why is that?
I don’t know.
Getting older?
Yeah. You get more confident that you can pull it off. Earlier, it would seem like a bad student film if you tried it, and everyone would laugh at it. Maybe it took me ten films to kind of feel like… “Okay.” But that’s not really true. By and large, I haven’t done anything that’s really “drama”. But that’s life. We all have tragedy and comedy. It’s always a jumble. That’s why, even when I’m doing a “drama” like Fast Food Nation and people want to take it seriously, there’s still a lot of humor in it. I can’t help but find humor in the most dramatic moments. I think that’s the human spirit, right? We bring that to everything. I mean, if you’re being honest.
You’ve done a couple of films that have more classical three-act structures (School of Rock and Bad News Bears), but have you ever had any yearnings to challenge yourself by doing something even more, I don’t know, “typical”?
I don’t know. (Mulls it over for a moment.) I think I kind of have. Isn’t School of Rock typical? You never want to do something you’ve seen before, or it feels like you’ve done it before. I don’t know. I don’t know the future. You could get interested in doing something like a genre piece, but I just don’t know.
I have to ask how you hooked up with Radiohead.
I contacted their manager and sent them the film. The guys liked it. I feel very lucky. Thom Yorke gave us the single off of his new album, and the band let us use a few songs. That’s kind of it so far. (Laughs) They’re busy and in England, so I haven’t had too much contact. We just got some songs, and apparently they’re fans.
Of Philip K. Dick or you?
You hear both, but you don’t really know. I haven’t really talked to them. But I was thrilled. They seem very much of the movie. In fact, Keanu and I were listening to Hail to the Thief a lot while we were working on this. Radiohead was kind of our band.
I know you’ve talked about this before, but do you have a better sense of whether or not you’ll reunite with Ethan and Julie for a third “Before” installment?
The tough one was that second one. Julie, Ethan and I were together not too long ago, and, you know, we talk about it. We joke about it. At three in the morning after a lot of glasses of wine, Julie gets pretty NC-17 about it. (Laughs) We’d have to have a great idea that just isn’t what everyone is expecting. It could be fun, though.
Wait. Julie gets NC-17 in terms of content?
Yeah.
Like, what, Last Tango in Paris or something really raw?
Yeah. Like if we do it, we have to deal with certain things.
Well, the one thing we haven’t seen them do yet is…
(Laughs) Yeah. We hint at it, we talk about it, but we haven’t actually seen it.
Finally, do you think there’ll be any more collaborations with The Criterion Collection?
That’s be great! It’s always tricky to get it to them if someone owns it that isn’t them. It took me years to get Universal to license Dazed and Confused to them. It’s a good final resting place. I love what they do. I wish everyone cared that much, but there’s so much money in it for the studios, and they think, “Oh, we can do that”. So they do it in house, but they’re not as good.
They don’t have the knowledge or the love.
They’re just selling balloons. (Laughs)
Both Richard and I agreed that was too brief, but maybe we’ll get a chance to ramble at greater length when Fast Food Nation turns up later this year. For now, though, it’s just great to have Linklater back doing his inimitably wistful thing. A Scanner Darkly opens Friday July 7th in limited release, and will go wider as the month wears on.
|
|
|
|
|